Reducing paper is about more than print costs and sustainability. There are also the issues of flexibility, accessibility, and accountability. This Cannell Library 30 Clicks session addresses print handling, PDF document format, and Microsoft Office review tools, and addresses pros, cons, and challenges of going paperless. Click here to download the handout from the Paperless Solutions session.
Email Etiquette II: Accessibility Emphasis
October 20, 2010What is accessibility?
Accessibile are designed to be effective in communicating to all users. While accessibility has applied primarily to people with disabilities, it has also expanded to include mobile device and software compaitibility. In short, keep your audience in mind!
Why Email?
It’s an important question! In general, email correspondence is used best for the following:
- Quick Q & A
- “FYI” information
- Negotiating complex schedules
- Sending digital documents quickly
To maximize these strengths, the sender should keep the following tips in mind:
Be readable
- 14-point font size is the new standard
- Use high contrast color between text and background. Avoid using images as background, as images increase the size of the message.
- Use clear, standard fonts: Arial, Times New Roman, Calibri, Cambria
Be simple
- Underlined text is discouraged due to its similarity to a hyperlink. Using color for emphasis is also discouraged for the same reason.
- If you must attach a PDF or embed an image, put key information into the body of the text.
- Use italics for emphasis. Bold is typically reserved for headings. Bold italics is acceptable, but rarely necessary. ALL CAPS READS LIKE SHOUTING.
Be clear
- Write to the proper language level of your audience.
- Use short sentences and paragraphs with clear topic and focus.
- Anticipate your response, and try to avoid extended exchanges.
- Be cautious of humor and sarcasm, which is often lost in the translation to text and particularly to screen reader.
Links
- How People with Disabilities Use the Web – Details web-specific interaction experiences for a variety of disabilities
- Readability index calculator: determines general readability level and score for inputted text.
- Plain English Campaign: An organization devoted to making public information readable
- Think Before You SEND: the web extension of Schipley and Schwalbe’s Send: Why People Email So Badly
- WebAIM – A comprehensive resource of web accessibility information
Prepared for the 2010 Northwest eLearning conference. For general email Etiquette Tips, Click here for the original Email Etiquette post.
Is PowerPoint dangerous?
October 6, 2010
The solution to the war in Iraq.
Does this chart mean anything to you? PowerPoint has been scrutinized nearly as long as it’s been utilized. One author proposes that the problem isn’t the program itself, but with the learning philosophy.
This New York Times article proposes that the fundamental flaw with PowerPoint is not that it’s boring (which it often is), linear (when minds aren’t), or static (by design). The problem is that PowerPoint encourages complex topics–such as military strategy–to be stripped of meaning and relegated to “dumb dumb bullets.” While bullet points can be effective in creating a foundation or providing an outline, it is the responsibility of the learners to create meaning.
Engaging the Gamers
June 9, 2010
The rise of video games since the early ‘80s has had a profound and deep impact upon the generation who grew up with them. In his book Gadgets, Games, and Gizmos for Learning, Karl Kapp investigates the “gamer generation” and in the process illustrates some key considerations for the workplace regarding the motivation, management, and training of gamers. He also highlights important differences in workplace values between the pre- and post-gaming generations.
Kapp is far from the only one to investigate the powerful role that videogames and games in general play in learning and development. Behavioral Psychologist Christopher J. Ferguson states in his article Put Video Games to Good Use that while an investigation into the link between violent games and violent behavior has been inconclusive, games unquestionably “provide a more engaging platform in which learning may occur.” He goes on to clarify:
The belief that video games foster aggression was based on the assumption that games imbue elementary changes in a person’s motivation and personality. These are fairly major changes; they require the player to essentially become a different person after playing. For games to function as educational tools, they require no such radical change. A player who succeeds at a serious game (or an educationally loaded commercial game) remains the same person after playing; he merely knows more than he did before.
While games have neither the power to change behavior nor intrinsic educational value, they are unquestionably a powerful tool for creating engaged learning experiences. Whether it be through a question-and-answer quiz game, a 3D online virtual world, or a spirited, passionate discussion, learning and engagement go hand in hand.
Literature on the subject of video games and learning is available in the Clark College TLC Resource Library. For information on engaging the gamer generation in the classroom and workplace, check out Gadgets, Games, and Gizmos for Learning by Karl Kapp, who has extensive resources available at the book’s website, his blog, and his personal website. For an in-depth study on connections between video games and learning, consider What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy by James Paul Gee.
Photo source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/linder/427414599/
Protecting a Word Document
May 10, 2010While the best way to secure a document is to save in Portable Document Format (PDF), you may still wish to protect part or all of a Microsoft Word 2007 document from unauthorized changes. Follow the directions below, or view the video walkthrough for a demonstration. For more options, consider viewing the Microsoft Office Online help article on protecting a document from unauthorized changes.
- Open the document you would like to protect.
- From Microsoft Word 2007, click “Review” on the Office Ribbon.
- Click the “Protect Document” button on the far right, and select “Restrict Formatting and Editing” from the drop-down menu. This will open a pane on the right side of the screen.
- Click the box next to “Allow only this type of editing in the document,” which will enable you to specify (in the drop-down menu) what types of changes you will allow.
- You may optionally select regions which will be “unprotected” from the restrictions. To do this, highlight these regions and select which users are allowed to freely edit this section (the default box is “Everyone”). This will create a greyed area in brackets around the text which is unrestricted.
- To complete the protection of the document, click the box labeled Yes, Start Enforcing Protection.
- You will be prompted to enter and verify a password. You must remember this password, as IT services will be unable to retrieve it for you once it is set. Click Ok when you are done.
- When the document is protected, users will only be able to modify sections which you have specifically marked unrestricted. Any other changes will require the password.
- Anytime a user attempts to edit a restricted document, the “Restrict Formatting and Editing” pane will appear informing the user that the document is protected. To unlock protection, click the Stop Protection button and enter the password.
What have you Googled today?
March 23, 2010
Much like the social networking comic strip, its a joke with a bit of meaning behind it. Ever since Google transitioned from a search engine to a verb, it’s fast becoming the go-to solution for pretty much anything that our memory can’t recall in less than five seconds. In many cases, a quick Google search turns up an answer faster than the help command (though often the Google result may be from the program vendor web site). What did Google do differently that allowed it to “revolutionize” how we search for information?
Under the dashboard, Google search results are tied to user input and content. The more an item is linked to, the higher its rank. What this means to you the user, is that when you type in a few keywords related to your search, the top result will likely be where most people have either gone for an answer or to discuss the issue. Having a brain snag? Chances are you can Google the answer faster than you can remember it. Have a MS Office question? Consider typing a few words in Google related to your inquiry to see if anyone has sought the same–or at least similar–answers as you have.
Don’t be afraid to utilize web resources in your search for information. Whether you are faculty, staff, or a student, a willingness to engage, and even contribute to, the online community discourse is an integral part of building technology fluency.
Give a man a fish, and he knows where to go to get fish.
Teach a man to fish, and you destroy your market base. What’s wrong with you?
“The Class” demonstrates pitfalls of classroom tech.
February 16, 2010Students at the University of Denver produced a parody of “The Office” to humorously depict some of the very real struggles faculty may run into when trying to “plug” tech directly into the classroom without regard to learning objectives. The lesson: always consider your learning outcomes first. Once you have those, only then can you decide which tools may best support these outcomes.
Posted by Julio Appling 


